hepatitis d virus infection among hepatitis b surface antigen carriers and in “isolated anti-hbc” antibodies profile in central tunisia

conclusions although hdv had low prevalence in our area, it is vital to plan preventive strategies for hdv spread as well as hbv prevention. it is particularly important to suspect hdv infection in active hbv carriers to manage a particularly severe dual infection. hdv infection should be suspected even in negative hbsag patients having “isolated anti-hbc” profile. results prevalence of hdv was 8.1% in hbsag carriers group, but it was significantly higher in active than inactive hepatitis (30.2% and 4.5%, respectively, or = 9, 95% ci: [4.48-18.58]). there was no significant association between studied risk factors and hdv infection. in the “isolated anti-hbc” profile group, prevalence of hdv was 4.6% and hbv-dna had negative result in all patients with positive results for hdv. background hepatitis d virus (hdv) causes accelerated liver diseases in patients with hepatitis b virus (hbv) infection. there is lack of data about its prevalence, related risk factors and interaction with hbv carriers in our country. objectives the aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of hepatitis delta and associated risk factors among hepatitis b surface antigen (hbsag) and “isolated anti-hbc” profile carriers in central tunisia. patients and methods in this cross-sectional study, 540 patients with positive hbsag and 109 “isolated anti-hbc” profile receiving care in a teaching hospital were tested for the presence of hdv serum-markers using commercially available enzyme immunoassay kit. hbv-dna was detected by nested pcr in “isolated anti-hbc” profile group.